Start with the role
Capture the level, working context, and skills the job actually calls for.
Turn the role into a structured assessment pipeline, grade every submission against the same criteria, and send the evidence that needs judgment to your team.
Automated hiring pipeline
ROLE CONTEXT
Backend platform engineer
01
Role
Signals and constraints
02
Recommended pipeline
Three practical stages
03
Candidate work
Work plus reasoning
04
Rubric grading
Same criteria, every time
05
Human review
Judgment stays with your team
Available today
The role context informs the stages. The stages carry their own rubrics. Candidate work returns to one review queue.
Capture the level, working context, and skills the job actually calls for.
Create coding, take-home, and system-design stages from a recommendation or build them by hand.
Share roles by private invite link or public board listing while keeping role details, instructions, deadlines, and assessment flow together.
Keep submissions, reflections, and stage status attached to the same hiring pipeline.
Run a consistent first pass against the approved criteria and surface the evidence behind each result.
Review the work, inspect exceptions, and keep the hiring decision with the people responsible for it.
Automated first pass
ShowWork evaluates submitted work against the approved rubric and keeps the supporting evidence beside the result. That gives reviewers a consistent starting point without pretending judgment can be outsourced.
Use the criteria your team approved
Every first-pass evaluation is anchored to the finalized assessment and its weighted rubric.
Organize the evidence
Bring relevant output, test results, and rubric findings into a reviewable result instead of a loose summary.
Keep people responsible for the decision
Reviewers can inspect the submission and resolve exceptions before making a hiring call.
Grading and reviewer handoff
Submission
Received
candidate-work.zip
Tests, source, and reflection
Weighted rubric
First pass
Implementation
34 / 40
Reliability
22 / 30
Reasoning
Review
WEIGHTED RESULT
74
Reviewer handoff
1 item
Inspect the tradeoff
The solution is sound, but the failure-mode explanation needs judgment.
Automated grading routes attention. It does not make the hiring decision.
Three assessment formats
Combine stages when one exercise cannot answer every important question. Each format has its own candidate experience and reviewer package.
Assess implementation and debugging in a timed coding workspace with visible and private validation.
Configured language and runtime
Starter code and examples
Tests, reference solution, and rubric
Give candidates a practical project to complete locally, with clear effort, window, and submission rules.
Starter project and commands
Private file validation
Upload notes and reflections
Evaluate architecture and tradeoffs in a blank-board session with continuous reasoning.
Role-specific design brief
Board and narration workspace
Structured discussion rubric
Operational control
Pipeline readiness, invitation activity, submissions, failed evaluations, and review backlog stay visible in the company workspace.
Private candidate links
Open a finalized role, issue a secure invitation, and keep each candidate tied to the right pipeline.
Weighted stage results
See stage progress and evaluation state without rebuilding the hiring record by hand.
A focused review queue
Bring pending human review and evaluation problems to the front of the team’s work.
Pipeline builder
Role context
Step 1
Senior backend engineer
API platform · Distributed team
Signals captured once
Recommended pipeline
3 stages
Debug a production API
Coding
Extend a service boundary
Take-home
Design for regional failure
System design
Review queue
Live
AUTOMATED FIRST PASS
4 ready
1 needs judgment
Reasoning evidence is mixed
Reviewers can inspect evidence, adjust scores, and record the decision.